From vigilance to vigil: an introduction to an alternative paradigm for technology, art, and life

Main Article Content

Matheus da Rocha Montanari
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-9044
Gilbertto Prado
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-3489

Abstract

In the context of datafication, the ways we relate to digital data and the world are based on vigilance. The production, usage, and analysis of data technology are gaining territory and power, while we are becoming aware of its dangerous vigilant behavior. Unsurprisingly, the ones outside hegemonic contexts are the most affected by this behavior. Nonetheless, we cannot simply deny this type of technology, we need to deeply rethink it. Being so, we resort to Amerindian philosophy, and its relation with plants to indicate different cosmotechnics as useful resources to review the current vigilance paradigm.  We show resonances of this thought in Latin American and Indigenous bio-art works, as well in the initiative of a Guarani-Kaiowá Virtual Museum. Thus, pointing out possibilities to develop a different relationship with data and technology which replaces a vigilance paradigm with one of vigil, or care.

Keywords: Vigilance, Vigil, Cosmotechnics, Technodiversity, Data, Bio-art, Non-human, Amerindian philosophy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrejevic, Mark. 2012. “Exploitation in the Data-Mine.” In Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, edited by C Fuchs, K Boersma, A Albrechtslund, and M Sandoval, 71–88. New York: Routledge.

Arantes, Priscila, and Gilbertto Prado. 2019. “Expanded Circuits and Poetic Re-Writings: Circuito Alameda.” In 25th International Symposium on Electronic Art, edited by Juyong Park, Juhan Nam, and Jin Wan Park, 679–82. Gwangju.

Carneiro da Cunha, Manuela. 2019. “Antidomestication in the Amazon: Swidden and Its Foes.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9, no. 1: 126–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/703870.

Couldry, Nick, and Ulises Mejias. 2019a. “Making Data Colonialism Liveable: How Might Data’s Social Order Be Regulated?” Internet Policy Review 8, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1411.

Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019b. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. California: Stanford University Press.

Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019c. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject.” Television and New Media 20, no. 4: 336–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632.

Coupaye, Ludovic. 2017. “Cadeia Operatória, Transectos e Teorias: Algumas Reflexões e Sugestões Sobre o Percurso de Um Método Clássico.” In Técnica e Transformação: Perspectivas Antropológicas, edited by Carlos Emanuel Sautchuk, 475–94. Brasília: ABA Publicações.

Dijck, José van. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance.” Surveillance & Society 12, no. 2: 197–208.

Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Harvey, Penny, Madeleine Reeves, and Evelyn Ruppert. 2013. “Anticipating Failure: Transparency Devices and Their Effects.” Journal of Cultural Economy, 249–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2012.739973.

Hui, Yuk. 2018. The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Asiascape: Digital Asia. Falmouth: Urbanomic.

Hui, Yuk. 2020. Tecnodiversidade. São Paulo: Ubu Editora.

João, Izaque. 2013. “Jerosy Puku.” PISEGRAMA 6: 15–17.

João Kaiowá, Izaque. 2020. “As Plantas Ouvem a Nossa Voz: Cantos e Cuidados Rituais Kaiowá.” In Vozes Vegetais: Diversidade, Resistências e Histórias Da Floresta, edited by Joana Cabral de Oliveira, Marta Amoroso, Ana Gabriela Morim de Lima, Karen Shiratori, Stelio Marras, and Laure Emperaire, 301–11. São Paulo: UBU, IRD.

Krenak, Ailton. 2017. “Ailton Krenak”. Organização de Sergio Cohn e de Idjahure Kadiwel. Coordenação de Kaká Werá. Rio de Janeiro: Azougue Editorial, 2017 (Coleção Tembetá).

Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2017. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray.

Mejias, Ulises A., and Nick Couldry. 2019. “Datafication.” Internet Policy Review 8, no. 4: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428.

Montanari, Matheus da Rocha, and Gilbertto Prado. 2021. “Techno-Bio-Diversities in Latin American Art: Circuito Alameda and Proyecto Bíos.” ARTECH: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3483529.3483699.

Morim De Lima, Ana Gabriela. 2016. “‘Brotou Batata Para Mim’ Cultivo, Gênero e Ritual Entre Os Krahô (TO, Brasil).”

Morim de Lima, Ana Gabriela. 2017. “A Cultura Da Batata-Doce: Cultivo, Parentesco e Ritual Entre Os Krahô.” Mana: Estudos de Antropologia Social 23, no. 2: 455–90. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-49442017v23n2p455.

Morim de Lima, Ana Gabriela, Creuza Prumkwyj Krahô, and Veronica Aldé. 2020. “Histórias e Cantos Do Milho Krahô: As Muitas Vozes Do Cerrado.” In Vozes Vegetais: Diversidade, Resistências e Histórias Da Floresta, edited by Joana Cabral de Oliveira, Marta Amoroso, Ana Gabriela Morim de Lima, Karen Shiratori, Stelio Marras, and Laure Emperaire, 283–300. São Paulo: UBU, IRD.

Morozov, Evgeny. 2018. Big Tech: A Ascenção Dos Dados e a Morte Da Política. São Paulo: Ubu.

Morozov, Evgeny. 2021. “Privacy Activists Are Winning Fights with Tech Giants. Why Does Victory Feel Hollow.” The Guardian, May 15, 2021.

Morozov, Evgeny, and Francesca Bria. 2019. A Cidade Inteligente: Tecnologias Urbanas e Democracia. São Paulo: Ubu.

Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.

O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Bog Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York City: Crown Publishers.

Prado, Gilbertto. 2018. “Circuito Alameda.” In Circuito Alameda, 28–37. Cidade do México: Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes, Laboratorio Arte Alameda.

Prado, Gilbertto. 2019. “Circuito Alameda: Algunos Apuntes Sobre Las Obras Jardín Alameda, Encontros, Caja de Choque y Serigrafías.” ANIAV - Revista de Investigación En Artes Visuales, no. 5: 13–29. https://doi.org/10.4995/aniav.2019.XXXX.

Rouvroy, Antoinette, and Thomas Berns. 2018. “Governamentalidade Algorítmica e Perspectivas de Emancipação: O Díspar Como Condição de Individuação Pela Relação?” In Tecnopolíticas Da Vigilância: Perspectivas Da Margem, edited by Fernanda Bruno, Bruno Cardoso, Marta Kanashiro, Luciana Guilhon, and Lucas Melgaço, 107–40. São Paulo: Boitempo.

Silva, Tarcízio da. 2020. “Visão Computacional e Racismo Algorítmico: Branquitude e Opacidade No Aprendizado de Máquina.” Revista Da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisador s Negr s - ABPN 12, no. 31: 428–48. https://doi.org/10.31418/2177-2770.2020.v12.n.31.p428-448.

Viveiros De Castro, Eduardo. 2002. “O Nativo Relativo.” Mana 8, no. 1: 113–48.

Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology 30, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5.

Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.